Archive for the ‘Counter-feminist hatred’ Category

What’s a Super-Suit’s gal to do …

June 6, 2009

You  can see before and after photos of  greasy and not-so-greasy gams  when  Gwyneth Paltrow appeared on the Tonight Show (gams rhymes with hams, and we all know where hams come from):

Gwyneth’s Greasy Gams – Goddess: celebrity moms – omg! on Yahoo

It’s not sick (as in culturally creepy) enough that any culturally notable “she” like Paltrow is expected to appear in American public culture with more touchable body on view than men typically need to show.  The 180 degrees from sick that’s still sick (i.e.,  culturally creepy) in patriarchal Islamic culture would literally cover up her thinking-instrument head and shroud her body as if dead from any contact with the natural world.

But I’m American and posting this post as a post-Christian not a Muslim (thank Goddess to disdain the multi-culti nonsense that refuses to call misogyny the woman-hating it is), so check out today’s online hysterics about  Gwyneth Paltrow’s legs.  The “greasy gams,” not the prodigious talent.  In context of  last season’s blockbuster movies, Oscar-winner Paltrow  played an iconic feminine subordinate gal putting her own life at risk to support a Super-Suit Iron Man’s exploits.  (She wore perfectly a slinky backless dress bought by her boss the Super-Suit.  She deadpanned the weak lines of script for her underwritten character with outrageous humor.  She acted heroically in high heels.)

Today’s online Gwyneth buzz irreverently links the hubbub about Paltrow’s gams  to  Goddess  in the same week  man-made religion’s big-three God (Islam, Judaism, Christianity) was front and center the Obama news as if that God has ever been about peace instead of piece.

Today’s trivialization of Goddess and woman occurs in context of the  beautiful Gwyneth (whose extraordinary good looks few could ever hope to achieve), who is also an actor of genius,  a mother and otherwise gifted.  If Paltrow is not a woman to be respected instead of trivialized —  then any normal woman might wonder, beneath being the “good sport” she’s constantly being asked to be despite man’s trivialization of her own life and womankind in general — who is?

If you doubt there’s a longest war …

June 6, 2009

Collectively the images here show the longest war, so if you have any doubt, go to prior month’s archives including a click to “older entries.”  Also check out the iconic super-male Hugh Jackman.  He’s super-hawt in his all-inclusive sexuality for normalizing focus on the physical body yet, being male, he usually wears a tux or power suit to cover all but his head and hands (thinking and take-action instruments) when seen in public.  The super-suit preserves the power image of the  overlord icon.

Not that Hugh Jackman is necessarily conscious of the social impact while he’s in the limelight raking in money.  But the rest of us need to ask how our minds are being manipulated in the name of others making a buck.

Ask not how hawt the he-man (any him, Him, He or hymn), but ask how to protect yourself because forewarned is forearmed.    What you don’t know can hurt you in the longest war.  Today’s “Scoop” for a male-dominant icon in summer 2009 theaters as  Wolverine —   Hugh Jackman  wielding the tarot card of “Death” while speaking down to a rapt, silent  young woman:

Scoop [dvd] [ws/dolby Digital 2.0 Mono/english Sdh/fr/span] (universal)

Other male-dominant images of media icons old and new shaping popular culture from  May 2009 older entries (prior posts):

Obama’s mankind, the sons of God … and to every man “a female”

June 4, 2009

Even if men of different male-dominant “God” faiths make peace among themselves, the longest war by the language here depicted is slated to continue against womankind — men’s rules, men’s game, every man to have “a female” on men’s terms.   It’s  not a world any self-respecting woman ought to accept.  Why aren’t feminists calling Obama on this?  He’s better looking than Bush, but, hey, he’s sounding as much like a misogynist behind the smile as his presidential predecessor.

[Excerpts on this blog for social commentary; note the Islamic head-scarved woman and ask yourself who in her or his right mind would choose  always to wear a cumbersome head-scarf in public if not for the cultural rules and social pressures Islamic men have imposed.]

By RACHEL ZOLL, AP Religion Writer Rachel Zoll, Ap Religion Writer 1 hr 31 mins ago

NEW YORK – President Barack Obama showed respect for Islam by quoting from the Quran in his speech Thursday but did so in a way meant to resonate with Christians and Jews as well….

“The Holy Quran tells us, ‘Mankind, we have created you male and a female. And we have made you into nations and tribes so that you may know one another,'” Obama said in the Cairo address. “The Talmud tells us, ‘The whole of the Torah is for the purpose of promoting peace.’ The Holy Bible tells us, ‘Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.'”

Whatever men may say, the God described has never been about peace but piece.  Goddess help us all.

The Counter-Feminist Fidel-what’s-his-name and Kyle Payne: Could they both be on the same side?

May 28, 2009

http://www.freewebs.com/birmingham-schools-kick-racism-out/influentialpeople.htm

An unsmiling Harriet Tubman said she would have freed more slaves (she freed a thousand as leader of the  Underground Railroad) if they had known they were slaves.  Harriet Tubman:  female genius.  She also seemingly channeled infinite Spirit through a woman-of-color’s spin on a Jesus who would set Her free — as in seeking Guidance about which way to escape when out in the woods with slaves she guided to freedom on nights of the dark moon (my interpretation from biographies).

Freedom for womankind has become muddled today as most women remain media-mentally if not physically enslaved by pro-male global culture, although good things have been written by many and good works also done by those  who identify as feminists.   Some of us care about our daughters more than we care about  male privilege.  Some of us don’t want our daughters to be mind-warped and body-twisted by patriarchy’s cultural enslavement of the female caste/class/race/genderization  (aka enslavement to subservience by any name), it seems to come down to a division based on wombs and phalluses even when men of color have achieved some social parity.  At best it breaks down into smiling visages (gals) and smokin’ dominance (guys),  in the longest war played out in the theater of the mind.  (Not to minimize war’s terrors of the body against women and children, or male violence including the trauma of rape.)

It occurs to me (having been pointed in another blog’s comments to Kyle Payne, and reading his pre-sex-offender papers — good stuff, and true, actually, about porn as woman-hating imagery and self-policing social compliance for women built into the patriarchal compact) — that Kyle Payne might not be what he appears to be.  Just a thought in the nature of social criticism.  Might Kyle Payne have been a cover for a woman-hater strategically placed ultimately to divide and conquer the freedom-fighting energies of women seeking liberation?  Is there an off-shore account in his name for his divisive work on behalf of the patriarchy?  Maybe I’ve seen too many movies?

Now that Kyle Payne’s been  resoundingly discredited in the criminal (not really justice) system, his prior pro-woman words, even the true ones, are being discredited.  A double whammy scored, perhaps, by the longest war.

Think spy networks, double and triple agents, and maybe that’s how the disinformation tactics of misogyny work (or maybe I should be writing James Bond screenplays).  Then again, in vast respect for my daughter’s intellect, maybe the collective mind power of womankind — if women were mentally freed — is so prodigious in its unmanipulated state that men of the war have to resort to extreme, underhanded measures to keep winning.  Men win when women do not see that lying man keeps waging underlying war against the freedom of womankind.

Imagine if any feminist dared to say, without substantiation, anything so direct against male domination as Fidel-what’s-his-name says against woman in his self-proclamation as a  “counter-feminist.”   His blog banner typifies the male woman-hating reversal of truth.  Fidel-what’s-his-name of course does not provide any images of cultural synthesis sufficient to back up his claims, because they are lies.   Shaming, sadistic lies. 

Media Attempts to Cripple Womankind in Worship of Sons and Falsely Promised Saviors

May 24, 2009
CARLOS  BY CARLOS SANTANA Women's Appeal SandalShe can barely walk with an even gait into the movie theater wearing internet-hyped shoes of this type, and when she gets there she will see:

Male images rule as usual (5-23-09) in media emphasis

  • Weekend Movie Roundup

    Weekend Movie Roundup

    ‘Terminator Salvation’ and ‘Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian.’

Male icons from Hollywood to Bollywood, young sons to even younger sons who get the focus of attention

  • 'The Last Airbender' Photos

This silent smile also denotes the war …

May 18, 2009
The WordPress login screen (5-17-09) showed this photo (silent smile) of a woman celebrating men’s lives by watching (because by male cultural definition she’s supposed to care about) the Greatest Bromances Of All Time.

Man-made culture doesn’t even have a name for woman-to-woman friendship equivalent to bromance, and there are no movies that come to mind (with the exception of the regrettable demise of Thelma and Louise, but hey, the movie makers might be thinking, Beautiful Bro Brad Pitt was there, so hey, “all’s fair in [don’t call it]  love and war.”)

Pretty clear in 2009, isn’t it, that sex with us men on terms equal to our own libidos (ex., “save a horse, ride a cowboy”) hasn’t given to women the cinematic stories, or the rights to their own company, equivalent to what men take as a given for being the self-defined only people on the planet who really matter?

LATXcreatures 368

Spoken only as a bro who’s tired of lance, bromance and this idiotic dance of the longest war.

Silent girl of the Hollywood hill (billboard) was no isolated media image; she, silenced, was everywhere in the major market through which millions of girls and women daily traveled

May 17, 2009

Pictures always say a thousand words x millions of girls x  millions of women x millions of men who dehumanize human beings without a voice that counts

LATXcreatures 294LATXcreatures 316

LATXcreatures 306LATXcreatures 350LATXcreatures 312

Silent girl of the Hollyhood hill — Deadpool at least gets his mouth back in the May 2009 Wolverine movie.

May 17, 2009

Silent girl (circa 2006) of the Hollyhood hill --- Deadpool at least gets his mouth back in the May 2009 Wolverine movie.

Silent girl (circa 2006) and this week, in the sounds of silence, polls showed that for the first time in decades of American history, anti-abortionists were winning the popular tide of opinion that a non-breathing, unnamed male embryo matters more than a fully breathing woman who does not have the right to choose for her own body what men do not want.

The “Silent Hill” girl, literally denied her voice, is the poster child for global media’s dividing and conquering of girls (hot and not) in the longest war. When men fall victim to the longest war, we’re collateral damage. Controlling female booty has always been the prize in the war between categories number one and number two. Number one, those who get to speak (men mainly) and in so doing, with violence as the enforcer, inhabit the category of human beings self-defined as those who matter most, men.   These are the one-down wicked terms of engagement in man’s war against womankind, the real war undergirding every other war.